quantaphase ii calibration range Search Results


quantaphase ii calibration range  (Bio-Rad)
90
Bio-Rad quantaphase ii calibration range
Quantaphase Ii Calibration Range, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/quantaphase ii calibration range/product/Bio-Rad
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
quantaphase ii calibration range - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
quantaphase ii assay  (Bio-Rad)
90
Bio-Rad quantaphase ii assay
Regression models for blood folate data generated by the BR and the MBA. (A) Finding the best fit for serum folate data in a convenience set of serum samples (n = 325) (4). The dashed vertical line represents the knot for the piecewise linear regression determined through a grid search (39 nmol/L). The correlation coefficients (R2) were as follows: linear, 0.94; piecewise linear, 0.95; and fractional polynomial, 0.95. The regression equations with x = log10BR and y = MBA were as follows: linear, y = 10**(0.847 · x + 0.372); piecewise linear, y = 10**(1.0847 · x + 0.0636) if x ≤1.595 and y = 10**(0.6591 · x + 0.7424) if x >1.595; and fractional polynomial, y = 10**(0.0188 · x3 – 2.7109 · x−1/2 + 3.8276). (B) Linear regression model showing the influence of MTHFR genotype on whole-blood folate in a convenience set of whole-blood samples (n = 171) (5). The correlation coefficients (R2) were as follows: C/C, 0.83; C/T, 0.92; and T/T, 0.80. The regression equations with x = log10BR and y = MBA were as follows: C/C, y = 10**(1.0937 · x + 0.0707); C/T, y = 10**(1.1137 · x + 0.0180); and T/T, y = 10**(0.9441 · x + 0.2924). (C) Finding the best fit for whole-blood folate data in a convenience set of whole-blood samples (n = 171) (4). The dashed vertical line represents the knot for the piecewise linear regression determined through a grid search (229 nmol/L). The correlation coefficients (R2) were as follows: linear, 0.80; piecewise linear, 0.80; and fractional polynomial, 0.80. The regression equations with x = log10BR and y = MBA were as follows: linear, y = 10**(1.0179 · x + 0.2175); piecewise linear, y = 10**(1.1108 · x + 0.0147) if x ≤2.36 and y = 10**(0.8216 · x + 0.6972) if x >2.36; and fractional polynomial, y = 10**(−15.4588 · x−2 * logex – 1.1317 · x−2 + 5.2092). Note: **designates exponential. BR, <t>Bio-Rad</t> radioassay; MBA, microbiologic assay.
Quantaphase Ii Assay, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/quantaphase ii assay/product/Bio-Rad
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
quantaphase ii assay - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Regression models for blood folate data generated by the BR and the MBA. (A) Finding the best fit for serum folate data in a convenience set of serum samples (n = 325) (4). The dashed vertical line represents the knot for the piecewise linear regression determined through a grid search (39 nmol/L). The correlation coefficients (R2) were as follows: linear, 0.94; piecewise linear, 0.95; and fractional polynomial, 0.95. The regression equations with x = log10BR and y = MBA were as follows: linear, y = 10**(0.847 · x + 0.372); piecewise linear, y = 10**(1.0847 · x + 0.0636) if x ≤1.595 and y = 10**(0.6591 · x + 0.7424) if x >1.595; and fractional polynomial, y = 10**(0.0188 · x3 – 2.7109 · x−1/2 + 3.8276). (B) Linear regression model showing the influence of MTHFR genotype on whole-blood folate in a convenience set of whole-blood samples (n = 171) (5). The correlation coefficients (R2) were as follows: C/C, 0.83; C/T, 0.92; and T/T, 0.80. The regression equations with x = log10BR and y = MBA were as follows: C/C, y = 10**(1.0937 · x + 0.0707); C/T, y = 10**(1.1137 · x + 0.0180); and T/T, y = 10**(0.9441 · x + 0.2924). (C) Finding the best fit for whole-blood folate data in a convenience set of whole-blood samples (n = 171) (4). The dashed vertical line represents the knot for the piecewise linear regression determined through a grid search (229 nmol/L). The correlation coefficients (R2) were as follows: linear, 0.80; piecewise linear, 0.80; and fractional polynomial, 0.80. The regression equations with x = log10BR and y = MBA were as follows: linear, y = 10**(1.0179 · x + 0.2175); piecewise linear, y = 10**(1.1108 · x + 0.0147) if x ≤2.36 and y = 10**(0.8216 · x + 0.6972) if x >2.36; and fractional polynomial, y = 10**(−15.4588 · x−2 * logex – 1.1317 · x−2 + 5.2092). Note: **designates exponential. BR, Bio-Rad radioassay; MBA, microbiologic assay.

Journal: The Journal of Nutrition

Article Title: Changes in Measurement Procedure from a Radioassay to a Microbiologic Assay Necessitate Adjustment of Serum and RBC Folate Concentrations in the U.S. Population from the NHANES 1988-2010 1 2

doi: 10.3945/jn.111.156901

Figure Lengend Snippet: Regression models for blood folate data generated by the BR and the MBA. (A) Finding the best fit for serum folate data in a convenience set of serum samples (n = 325) (4). The dashed vertical line represents the knot for the piecewise linear regression determined through a grid search (39 nmol/L). The correlation coefficients (R2) were as follows: linear, 0.94; piecewise linear, 0.95; and fractional polynomial, 0.95. The regression equations with x = log10BR and y = MBA were as follows: linear, y = 10**(0.847 · x + 0.372); piecewise linear, y = 10**(1.0847 · x + 0.0636) if x ≤1.595 and y = 10**(0.6591 · x + 0.7424) if x >1.595; and fractional polynomial, y = 10**(0.0188 · x3 – 2.7109 · x−1/2 + 3.8276). (B) Linear regression model showing the influence of MTHFR genotype on whole-blood folate in a convenience set of whole-blood samples (n = 171) (5). The correlation coefficients (R2) were as follows: C/C, 0.83; C/T, 0.92; and T/T, 0.80. The regression equations with x = log10BR and y = MBA were as follows: C/C, y = 10**(1.0937 · x + 0.0707); C/T, y = 10**(1.1137 · x + 0.0180); and T/T, y = 10**(0.9441 · x + 0.2924). (C) Finding the best fit for whole-blood folate data in a convenience set of whole-blood samples (n = 171) (4). The dashed vertical line represents the knot for the piecewise linear regression determined through a grid search (229 nmol/L). The correlation coefficients (R2) were as follows: linear, 0.80; piecewise linear, 0.80; and fractional polynomial, 0.80. The regression equations with x = log10BR and y = MBA were as follows: linear, y = 10**(1.0179 · x + 0.2175); piecewise linear, y = 10**(1.1108 · x + 0.0147) if x ≤2.36 and y = 10**(0.8216 · x + 0.6972) if x >2.36; and fractional polynomial, y = 10**(−15.4588 · x−2 * logex – 1.1317 · x−2 + 5.2092). Note: **designates exponential. BR, Bio-Rad radioassay; MBA, microbiologic assay.

Article Snippet: However, a recalibrated Bio-Rad Quantaphase II assay (using a spectrophotometrically verified folic acid calibrator) was introduced in 1993 and was used in the second phase of NHANES III (1991–1994) and in NHANES 1999–2006 ( 3 ).

Techniques: Generated

Frequency distribution curves for unadjusted and assay-adjusted serum folate data for NHANES 1988–1994 (A; n = 23,361 unadjusted and 23,359 adjusted), for 1999–2002 (B; n = 15,653 unadjusted and adjusted), and for 2003–2006 (C; n = 15,331 unadjusted and adjusted) and for unadjusted data for NHANES 2007–2010 (D; n = 15,889). Adjustments were performed by regressing Bio-Rad radioassay data from 1988 to 1994 and from 1999 to 2006 to microbiologic assay–equivalent data.

Journal: The Journal of Nutrition

Article Title: Changes in Measurement Procedure from a Radioassay to a Microbiologic Assay Necessitate Adjustment of Serum and RBC Folate Concentrations in the U.S. Population from the NHANES 1988-2010 1 2

doi: 10.3945/jn.111.156901

Figure Lengend Snippet: Frequency distribution curves for unadjusted and assay-adjusted serum folate data for NHANES 1988–1994 (A; n = 23,361 unadjusted and 23,359 adjusted), for 1999–2002 (B; n = 15,653 unadjusted and adjusted), and for 2003–2006 (C; n = 15,331 unadjusted and adjusted) and for unadjusted data for NHANES 2007–2010 (D; n = 15,889). Adjustments were performed by regressing Bio-Rad radioassay data from 1988 to 1994 and from 1999 to 2006 to microbiologic assay–equivalent data.

Article Snippet: However, a recalibrated Bio-Rad Quantaphase II assay (using a spectrophotometrically verified folic acid calibrator) was introduced in 1993 and was used in the second phase of NHANES III (1991–1994) and in NHANES 1999–2006 ( 3 ).

Techniques:

Frequency distribution curves for unadjusted and assay-adjusted RBC folate data for NHANES 1988–1994 (A; n = 23,402 unadjusted and 22,846 adjusted), for 1999–2002 (B; n = 15,827 unadjusted and 15,613 adjusted), and for 2003–2006 (C; n = 15,451 unadjusted and 15,196 adjusted) and for unadjusted data for NHANES 2007–2010 (D; n = 15,951). Adjustments were made by regressing Bio-Rad radioassay data from 1988 to 1994 and from 1999 to 2006 to microbiologic assay–equivalent data.

Journal: The Journal of Nutrition

Article Title: Changes in Measurement Procedure from a Radioassay to a Microbiologic Assay Necessitate Adjustment of Serum and RBC Folate Concentrations in the U.S. Population from the NHANES 1988-2010 1 2

doi: 10.3945/jn.111.156901

Figure Lengend Snippet: Frequency distribution curves for unadjusted and assay-adjusted RBC folate data for NHANES 1988–1994 (A; n = 23,402 unadjusted and 22,846 adjusted), for 1999–2002 (B; n = 15,827 unadjusted and 15,613 adjusted), and for 2003–2006 (C; n = 15,451 unadjusted and 15,196 adjusted) and for unadjusted data for NHANES 2007–2010 (D; n = 15,951). Adjustments were made by regressing Bio-Rad radioassay data from 1988 to 1994 and from 1999 to 2006 to microbiologic assay–equivalent data.

Article Snippet: However, a recalibrated Bio-Rad Quantaphase II assay (using a spectrophotometrically verified folic acid calibrator) was introduced in 1993 and was used in the second phase of NHANES III (1991–1994) and in NHANES 1999–2006 ( 3 ).

Techniques: